Archive for January, 2010

Look for the Union Email

So lately we’ve been seeing lots of maneuvering in congress related to this whole health care reform thing.  Fear not!  I am not about to offer any attempt at political commentary.  I generally avoid such conflict because most of it is just not worth the trouble.

But there’s been a new development of late that gave me a great idea.  I am purposefully going to be vague about the policy details behind this, because I don’t want to look them up, and you probably don’t care about them anyway.

One of the ideas floated recently is that so-called “Cadillac” health care plans should incur new taxes to help defray other costs of health care.  This concept presumably led to a hearty round of backslapping among the assembled reform supporters.  And then another reform supporter in the form of a big labor union pointed out that, um, many big labor unions that are supporting health care reform have union members with Cadillac health care plans, and they’re not so keen on the whole new tax thing.

So what do congresspersons generally do in a situation like this when one of their bright ideas runs afoul of one of their loyal constituent groups?  (I’m being bipartisan here.  Truly).

1.    Slap themselves humbly on their collective forehead and say, “Gee, we didn’t think that idea through fully.  Maybe we should come up with a better way.”
2.    Slap the bearer of bad news a five and say, “Oh, we didn’t mean we were going to tax YOUR expensive health care plan.  We’re going to tax everybody ELSE’s expensive health care plan.”

And thus was born the idea of taxing Cadillac health care plans, unless said plans are affiliated with a labor union.  In case this does happen, I’m already thinking ahead.  I doubt my plan would qualify for the new tax, but I am feeling empathy for those who would have to pay more taxes than others just because they don’t have a union card.  I am also feeling entrepreneurial and ready to ride to the rescue of the disenfranchised.

Thus, I am proud to publicly announce my intention to organize a new labor-union called the National Brotherhood and/or Sisterhood of the Independent Occasional Blog-Reading Nincompoops.

Anybody can join by sending in their $25 annual dues to an account to be named later.  What do NBAOSOTIOBRN union members get in return?

1.     An annual email confirming their membership is in good standing.  (Handsome laminated card available for an additional modest fee).
2.    Aggressive public advocacy, in the form of a carefully worded press release posted on the union’s website once a quarter, proclaiming the intelligence, diligent work ethic, and general physical attractiveness of union members.
3.    A legal way to save thousands in taxes by following the rules currently under consideration in congress.

Oh, sure, congress will probably come up with some wacky rule that in order to receive the union tax break, the union will actually have to administer the actual health care plan.  We all know such a rule will have more loopholes than a Berber carpet.  We can work something out.  I bet NBAOSOTIOBRN members can qualify for the tax break if the union simply serves as a consultant regarding health care decisions.  I envision some form of automatic online consultation that would take place when a member pays his or her annual dues:

Q:  Should I participate in my employer’s healthcare plan?
A:  Probably!

Q:  Now that I’ve paid my $25 union membership and consulted you about my health care choices, can I claim the thousands of dollars congress is offering as a special benefit to union members?
A:  Our lawyer assures us we cannot be held legally liable if you do!

Q:  Thanks!
A:  No problem.  See you during enrollment next year.

What’s not to like?

(This is where I would like to point out to any member of congress, the IRS, or pretty much anybody who might have a real legal objection to this idea, that satire is a legally protected form of speech.  This is satire.  As far as you can tell).

No Comments

The Humble Servant 2 – Ping Pong Wizard

Happy New Year.  Today let’s review yet another time in my life I experienced an enhanced level of involuntary humility.

The summer before my senior year of high school I was fortunate enough to be chosen for a program for Kentucky high school students.  I was invited to spend a few weeks living on the UK campus and taking a small number of classes (not for college credit).  It’s a pretty neat program that’s been going on for roughly thirty years now.  Some enterprising legislator had the bright idea (or borrowed it from another state) that perhaps something like this would encourage students to attend in-state schools, or give them a head start on college that would benefit our commonwealth somewhere down the road.

This program was a really good experience for me.  It was sort of a practice run for college without the pressure of the whole grade point average thing.  One important lesson I learned is that if you get insufficient sleep for enough consecutive nights, it is in fact possible to fall asleep upright on a science lab chair in the middle of a lecture.  Another important lesson I learned is that if you’re a seventeen year-old boy and are preparing to spend a chunk of your summer intentionally keeping a respectful distance from ubiquitous smart, cute, high-achieving high school girls, you might want to double-check and make sure your girlfriend back home isn’t going to break up with you upon your return.  Not that I’m bitter.

All the boys in this program lived together in a single dormitory where we discussed deep issues such as life goals, theology, and whether boys or girls had a more closed-minded definition of physical attractiveness.  This last topic eventually led to an experiment wherein every boy or girl in the program was asked who they thought was the best-looking attendee of the opposite sex.  Whichever gender chose the largest number of different individuals as best-looking must therefore have a more open-minded view of physical beauty.

(You might be interested in knowing the results of this non-scientific survey.  I would be delighted to tell you, but I don’t remember.  I think the numbers came out roughly even.  Sadly, all I remember for sure is that the survey did not remain anonymous and my name did not appear on the comprehensive list of boys receiving votes as best-looking.  One of my friends received one vote and found himself unsettled by the knowledge that out of all those girls, there was ONE who thought he was tops.  He could not figure out who she was.  His quest to find her may have led him to some diagnosable disorder by the end of the summer.  Somehow I was not sympathetic to his plight despite the luxury of peaceful assurance that NONE of these girls voted for me).

Perhaps the saddest part of the somewhat humiliating prelude above is that it’s not even the humiliating story I set out to tell you.

The boys’ dormitory had a ping pong table in the basement.  Every night a small crowd would gather to play.  I was pretty good because we had a ping pong table at home.  I even had my parents bring me my favorite paddle when they came for a visit.  Every so often I’d go downstairs and play four or five matches and then just retire undefeated.  I was unbeaten all summer.

(I almost wrote that I was the King Kong of ping pong but then decided it would be a really awkward thing to say.  My feeling is that anything worthy of an eye-roll that is said inside parentheses cannot really be held against the author.  I imagine parentheses as a sort of warm, happy place for the amateur writer.  Like a non-threatening mental Snuggie.  While I’m getting this out of my system let me also say that I have always thought Parentheses would be a great name for the Greek god of the digression).

And then somebody decided to hold a ping pong tournament.  Of course I signed up for this.  What seventeen-year old boy declines an invitation to demonstrate he’s the best at something?  When the tournament pairings came out I checked the list to see when I would eventually meet any of the better players I had encountered.  My first round opponent was a guy who hadn’t even played with us all summer.

When the tournament began I sauntered in with my intimidating, smooth-surfaced, personal ping pong paddle.  It really was much nicer than the cheesy ones lying around the dorm basement.  And then my opponent walked in and I immediately made four key observations:

  1. He was also brandishing his own ping pong paddle.
  2. He was carrying his own ping-pong paddle in his own ping pong paddle carrying case.
  3. I did not know there was such a thing as a case specifically made to carry a ping-pong paddle.  (They already have a handle, after all).
  4. A dorm basement full of vanquished foes just may have set me up.

One could easily sense the eagerness of the other boys to witness the epic clash of teenage ping pong titans that was about to transpire.  I feigned nonchalance as my foe unzipped his carrying case.

The kid was good.  He immediately jumped out to a lead.  I was used to playing against kids using what were closer to boat oars than good paddles, and was unprepared to react to his ability to put a lot of spin on the ball.  I had been the only one who could do that.  My dad could apply fairly healthy spin but I hadn’t played against him all summer.  I rallied and crawled back into the match, but continued making too many unforced errors reacting to his spin.  It was a very competitive and fun match the whole way.

In the end, much like the Mighty Casey struck out, the Mighty Mark spun the heavily back-spun gas-filled celluloid ball into the net one too many times. I hadn’t played my best match, but this kid hadn’t played any all summer.  He was simply a better player.

While only a vague and distant memory now (his name was John, by the way), one lesson stands clear.  No matter how good I think I might be at something, there’s somebody better.  And I probably don’t have to look very far to find him.

(But I am pretty sure I was better-looking than he was).

1 Comment